Sankaku Channel/

ALAKTORN said:
^So, do you think multiple_futanari should also be a tag?

Absolutely. It has just as much utility as multiple_boys or multiple_girls. (On another topic, I plan to start a thread soon pitching that each count tag greater than 1, such as 2girls, be implicated to its multiple_[gender] equivalent.)

ALAKTORN said:
By the way, I don’t really like the naming 2futas etc. Even the 1girl etc. I think needs renaming. I’d call those 1_female, 2_females etc. while the futanari ones could be 1_futanari, 2_futanari etc.

Despite its more specific tone, The current syntax (1girl, etc.) benefits from being more personal and engaging (girl vs female), and more engaing means more awesome for the user experience. It is also very easy to type, containing just 5 characters and no underscores to potentially confuse some of our newer users.

ALAKTORN said:
I also dislike the Anglicization of the word by pluralizing it with an “s”, btw. Wiktionary says that the plural form remains “futanari”. I’d go with that. If we want it to be “futa” then I’d use “futa” for plural as well, rather than “futas”.

I didn't know that, but now that I do, I totally agree.

ALAKTORN said:
Edit: Oh and by the way, I was thinking that newhalf also falls into the intersex category. So that kinda complicates things. I’m not sure though.

"Newhalf" differs from "futanari" in that it describes a male character/person who has undergone a transsexual operation to a woman (Wiktionary, 2015). Other sources describe "newhalf" as similar to a futanari, that is primarily female in appearance, but which may or may not contain female genitals. For the sake of developing a catch-all set of counting tags rather than multiple sets of counting tags (for futanari, transgender, newhalf, etc.,) these differences can be specified on our catch-all term's wiki page.