close

ALAKTORN said:
cleft_of_venus sounds like something that should be explicit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pudendal_cleft. Don’t know about cameltoe, but I consider a cameltoe as “clear outlines of the vagina”.

Edit: maybe the “erect nipples” under questionable should also be specified to be “erect nipples under clothes”.

The first sentence under questionable says: "too sexy for Safe without showing actual nudity"

I hoped it would imply that everything following would automatically suggest "under clothes"

I would agree a nude cleft_of_venus would be EXPLICIT but the point I hoped to make that it's OK for a "line", "slit" or "cleft" to appear under panties, a swimsuit or tight clothes and still be QUESTIONABLE. I think even a subtle clitoris under clothes would be questionable but if it's obviously pronounced and throbbing would bump it into explicit.

For "clear outlines of the vagina" I meant inner labia and vulva. Examples are posts like:

https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/1733584
https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/4212704
https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/720425 and
https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/3957706

Obviously two of these would be explicit for the bare breasts, but hopefully you get the point. Now I see that "spread_vagina_under_clothes" is its own tag so perhaps it would be acceptable if I replaced "clear outlines" with that?

I see that some are questionable but I think all of spread_vagina_under_clothes should be EXPLICIT.

I was wondering about bondage and bdsm, should these be mentioned one way or the other? You could argue that bondage should always be at least questionable, but currently Post #4381107 is rated safe.

I agree all bondage and bdsm should be at least QUESTIONABLE without nudity and EXPLICIT with nudity. I'd be happy to add them unless you think a discussion is in order.