Gundam Extreme VS Maxi Boost ON Announced For Arcades
Hentai Kamen: “The Exhibitionist Returns!”
Star Ocean 5’s Relia Magically Moe
Dropout Drops More Than Just Studies
Sword Art Online Becomes A Reality: “VRMMO Announced!”
Edbum's Personal Janitor said:
If this is something you ever wanted anyone to take seriously, why would you put that there. Do you know who else was obsessed with drug references?Thank you.
Nuh-Uh!! Thank You...for doing exactly what I asked you not to and restoring about tha same amount of faith I had in you since the start..also for misspelling made as mad, that was worth a chuckle!
ALSO
If you think that's a drug reference then I know we were meant to be sworn enemies...in some dimension or other because I'm an Arcade Maniac and every gamer worth their joystick lives & dies on ye ole
"WINNERS DON'T USE DRUGS"
William S. Sessions, Dir, FBI
from the Arcade scene of tha 90s on! My youtube channel is named after this and I put it on Anonymous posts I post on other sites as well as deviantART! I put em here to signify that it was I that "mad up" those tags but that was before I realized this site has a system to signify who did what, when, where & sometimes why!
Keir_Tanaka said:
"WINNERS DON'T USE DRUGS"
Couldn't care less here it came from.
Just don't put such nonsense as some sort of signature in a wiki page. Thank you.
Galinoa said:
Couldn't care less 'here' it came from.
Just don't put such nonsense as some sort of signature in a wiki page. Thank you.
Never asked you of all people to care! You're Quite Welcome!
Keir_Tanakabum14 said:
Never asked you of all people to care! You're Quite Welcome!
No, actually, I'm pretty sure you've been begging for attention ever since you very publicly announced that you've made a bunch of pointless tags.
Tall Bum kitten Janitor said:
No, actually, I'm pretty sure you've been begging for attention ever since you very publicly announced that you've made a bunch of 'pointless' tags.
Well I see you have 000 qualms about bolstering your opinions & standards as irrefutable fact; oh right, we already established that! I can't believe I have to spell this out: I did that more-so to expose that it was I "term: vandalizing" yall's hard-earned tags "with reckless abandon & extreme prejudice like nobody's business" lately and that was more a confession than anything! I was hoping to come to a sort of understanding & such but I appreciate you being upfront with how big a mistake that was; I mean what was I thinking expecting yall's responses to be tha least bit reasonable and not at all vindictive & spiteful of my tags that don't slow down a dam thing!
Please try to use proper English and refrain from adding irrelevant stuff to wikis such as the drugs thing. Regarding the new tags I tend to agree with the others who say they seem useless.
ET-TU ALAKTORN said:
Please try to use proper English and refrain from adding irrelevant stuff to wikis such as the drugs thing. Regarding the new tags I tend to agree with the others who say they seem useless.
How many times do I have to say this, my tags shorten the amount of words I have to type in to find what I want! You may not like it but that doesn't make it pointless or useless, especially since these tags aren't impeding anyone else! My tags are actually very clear and quite easy to spot!
ALSO
I enjoy using slang such as yall & tha in my written speech but since you said please...I'll think about it; again "the drugs thing" was added so I would remember that it was I who filled in those wikis before I realized this site has(for lack of a better word)security cameras!
Keir_Tanaka said:
before I realized this site has(for lack of a better word)security cameras!
Well we don't want bad people to do bad things now don't we?
Well I am trying to set a better example...even though some would argue I'm more an example of how NOT to do it!
ALSO
Since it's not looking good for me here and I have very little chance of "winning" this argument..I've decided I'm not gonna argue the validity of my "mad up" tags anymore!
Keir_Tanaka said:
Since it's not looking good for me here and I have very little chance of "winning" this argument..I've decided I'm not gonna argue the validity of my "mad up" tags anymore!
It's not about winning the argument. I (personally) was just trying to tell you, those tags are too picky. And if maintained by only one man, it won't get far. If i wanted to achieve the searches specified by those tags, i would just add subtraction tags to either bottomless or nude. That's all.
Galinoa said:
It's not about winning the argument.
Well that's why I put winning in quotation marks, winning could really be swapped out for "convincing everyone here that my reasons hold any weight" in this case!
Galinoa said:
I (personally) was just trying to tell you, those tags are too picky. And if maintained by only one man, it won't get far. If i wanted to achieve the searches specified by those tags, i would just add subtraction tags to either bottomless or nude. That's all.
If you all prefer to put in however many words+dashes and/or underscores to reach your personal "Promised Land" then I'm not holding that against you!
I deleted my Post #3656298 because it's pretty much a smaller version of the parent, but then I realized it had less frames, so that was (maybe) unnecessary.
Should I undelete it?
The loop is different then the parent, so I see no reason to delete it.
Steinkauz said:
The loop is different then the parent, so I see no reason to delete it.
Alright.
Any news on any sort of shuffle feature? Being able to put my favourites in a always random order (not a stable random order like order:random) would be perfect.
Should images featuring only females be tagged "femdom" since...well kinda obvious?
I think you misunderstood the definition of femdom. Femdom ≠ only females.
Do some research, and you'll see why this is a bad idea.
Galinoa said:
I think you misunderstood the definition of femdom. Femdom ≠ only females.
Do some research, and you'll see why this is a bad idea.
I also thought it obvious that I was questioning why some user(s) thought it a good idea to tag femdom to images featuring only females!
I've seen a quite literal ton of images tagged femdom when there's only females to be found anywhere within!
They may as well tag femsub in there as well because that's the only other option available in the image proper!
21321 said:
Any news on any sort of shuffle feature? Being able to put my favourites in a always random order (not a stable random order like order:random) would be perfect.
The webmaster doesn’t come to the forum anymore so I don’t know whether he’ll ever see your request…
There is an IMHO dissatisfying situation with implications - please see "_ears" in "implications":
https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/tag_implication?commit=Search+Implications&name=_ears&order=date&approval_status=any
Here's what I think is suboptimal and how to improve the situation:
bunny_ears implies animal_ears, but since bunny_ears are used (mostly? exclusively?) for bunny costume ears and alike, it should rather imply fake_animal_ears.
fake_animal_ears implies animal_ears, but is should rather imply headgear, thereby emphasizing that the ears are not part of the character but part of the costume. For bunny ears that are part of the character (I didn't find any, fran's ears seem to be (a part of her) headgear, too) rabbit_ear could be used, alas, all of those are now (fake) bunny ears.
RockB said:
There is an IMHO dissatisfying situation with implications - please see "_ears" in "implications":
https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/tag_implication?commit=Search+Implications&name=_ears&order=date&approval_status=anyHere's what I think is suboptimal and how to improve the situation:
bunny_ears implies animal_ears, but since bunny_ears are used (mostly? exclusively?) for bunny costume ears and alike, it should rather imply fake_animal_ears.
fake_animal_ears implies animal_ears, but is should rather imply headgear, thereby emphasizing that the ears are not part of the character but part of the costume. For bunny ears that are part of the character (I didn't find any, fran's ears seem to be (a part of her) headgear, too) rabbit_ear could be used, alas, all of those are now (fake) bunny ears.
...There's usamimi.
They're frequently (and incorrectly) tagged as usa_mimi, which actually refers to the Kodomo no Jikan character, but since it would be easier to create another tag for her than to clean up the tag, that's exactly what I did (see usa_mimi_(kodomo_no_jikan)). I think I never remembered to move the translation around, though.
Also, you forgot (or don't know) usa-tan.
By the way, shouldn't you bring this up in here or here?
Edit: Oh, and BTW, I guess it's to System that I should bring this up (but I guess a second and even third opinion would be good), but I think the "Untranslated Only" option in the tag index and tag translation index should instead be an option to search for either translated or untranslated posts or for both, like you can search by Order, Tag Type, Language (which is useless as far as I know), etc.
And I believe this has been suggested already, but I also think it should be possible to search for Translations, Aliases and Implications by the user who created them.
Keir_Tanaka said:
I also thought it obvious that I was questioning why some user(s) thought it a good idea to tag femdom to images featuring only females!
I've seen a quite literal ton of images tagged femdom when there's only females to be found anywhere within!
They may as well tag femsub in there as well because that's the only other option available in the image proper!
I'm not quite sure I get what you're getting at. Are you suggesting femdom should only apply if there is a male to be dominated? Because that is not the case. Femdom implies nothing more than at least one dominant female is in the picture and nothing about the femdom's target. By your use of the plural I'm assuming you mean posts with at least two females and no males. Posts can be tagged both femdom and femsub if it's an s&m type post with both a female dominant and a female submissive. Somone who has this fetish correct me if I am wrong but I believe solo posts can also be tagged femdom if it is clear the woman in the pic is a dominatrix of some sort or solo femsub if the female is in some form of s&m binding, ties, chains, racks, masks, or what have you.
How about a sticky topic for all tag alias & tag implication & whatnot.
It is an eyesore to visit the forum and see 13/14 advalable topics filled with
- tag alias:x
- tag alias:x
- tag alias:x
- tag alias:x
- tag alias:x
- tag alias:x
- etc
yea/nay?
^Those are automatically created topics through the “Propose” function in the Alias/Implication pages. That’s how System set it up. The sticky you’re talking of already exists. I’ve asked him to create a sub-forum for dealt-with issues and to give mods the power to move topics, but he never replied.
Tucky said:
Are you suggesting femdom should only apply if there is a male to be dominated?
I was...
Tucky said:
By your use of the plural I'm assuming you mean posts with at least two females and no males.
I was...
Tucky said:
Somone who has this fetish correct me if I am wrong but I believe solo posts can also be tagged femdom if it is clear the woman in the pic is a dominatrix of some sort or solo femsub if the female is in some form of s&m binding, ties, chains, racks, masks, or what have you.
I don't have the fetish per-se but as per those who affect it proper that I've seen in tha past prefer a malesub depicted as a self-insert I suppose but ultimately..I'm not really asking any changes be made but merely bringing it to everyone's attention that gives a crap to do something about it is all!
I'm not sure if this is the correct place for this but it would appear someone has deleted this here pool that had been created not so long ago?
^It was deleted because pools aren’t made to be used like that. You can find those images with an image search, so they don’t belong in a pool.
From System, bad pools:
“Consisting simply of personal favourites (users should use their favourites)
Being mostly or completely replicable through tag searches
Being empty
Not having any clear purpose
Being marked as "test" or otherwise”
Good pools:
“The ideal pools are ordered sets of posts or collaboratively edited collections of posts.”
ALAKTORN said:
^It was deleted because pools aren’t made to be used like that. You can find those images with an image search, so they don’t belong in a pool.
In addition, you're already familiar with the subscription function and favoriting posts, so please stick to using that.
Tallcat
4 months agoIf this is something you ever wanted anyone to take seriously, why would you put that there. Do you know who else was obsessed with drug references? I'm guessing you do.
Thank you.