Sankaku Channel/Suggestions

just_juan said:
saki_(series) and aria_(series) or saki_(manga) and aria_(manga)?

I guess _(series) works…

ALAKTORN said:
I guess _(series) works…

Okay, I'll try working on that when I have time again.
I think the best way to do that is searching for characters and replacing the tags via tag script. Which is the character with the biggest count on either series?

I can only use my phone for internet, so the mobile site is already a fantastic start for me, but two functions I'd love for you to incorporate from the site are 1) the ability to change browsing between scrolling and searching by page, and 2) the ability to open a few tabs at once. I'm not sure how possible these are, since opening more tabs probably stresses the site out, but page-by-page searching is the only way I'm going to find a lot of artworks I'm looking for...

I think it would be nice if there was an iphone friendly version. I guess I'll just have to be patient.

Lionmaster15 said:
I think it would be nice if there was an iphone friendly version. I guess I'll just have to be patient.

An Windows Phone friendly version would be good too, because that's what I have right now. I plan on getting an Android phone, but that'll only be possible when my father gets a new phone (his will become mine).

Changing subject, I've suggested this before, but I think it should be possible to add more than one parent to a single post. I also wish a "magazine" tag type existed both here and on IC, and that IC's "photo set" tag type was added to SC. I've suggested that to System but he says he doesn't see the difference between magazines and copyrights (he didn't say anything about photo sets).

Finally found the time to write this.
I dislike the displayal of parent and children posts on the channel.
Right now, it gets really messy, if you don't give every post of a family tree the same parent, because you can't easily see the whole family tree. I made a little graphic to display the problem:

http://i.imgur.com/PRJcbCJ.png

The boxes display which post's you have access to, while accessing the smaller boxed picture.
If you are on Post A, you can see B and C, but not D
-if C, then A and D, but not B
-if D, then C, but not A and B

"Why this is a problem, just lump they all together like you already do?!"
If D is a photoshop/decensored version of a picture, it would be nice if it is parented to it's right source post, not to a general parent for viewing convinience. Also, if you are on a page of a post which has a parent and a child, the boxes get pretty large, covering almost half of the screen. My suggestion would be a danbooru approach dumping everything into one parent box which is all the time present, sorted, smaller and more compact. Should look like that:

http://i.imgur.com/k0hUakb.png

Size differences to show the relationships of each post, same for the order. Because we have too many color borders.
Hope this is realizeable, someday.

:O)

Is there any way to implement keyboard shortcuts like danbooru.donmai.us?

Also, it would be great if the rating would change color after you rated a post. Sort of like Netflix ratings so you would know what you've already seen/rated.

I personally think comments should be editable.
To be exact, I question why they aren't.

I would like to be able to see file size along with the other image stats in the mouse-over tooltip for image thumbnails.

I've invented the tags full-on bottomless/full-on naked & interracial-symmetry recently!

Keir_Tanaka said:
I've invented the tags full-on bottomless/full-on naked & interracial-symmetry recently!

I notice you've started the "bottomless" and "barefoot". Going to have to ask you not to do that any more as your "full-on bottomless" and "loose-barefoot" and "full-on naked" tags are completely pointless.

Tallcat said:
I notice you've started the "bottomless" and "barefoot". Going to have to ask you not to do that any more as your "full-on bottomless" and "loose-barefoot" and "full-on naked" tags are completely pointless.

...you forgot to add "to me" there at the end because you can't presume to speak for the exacting standards of everyone!
.
.
Well Anyway, I didn't start bottomless & barefoot but I did edit their meanings as they were empty same as "loose-barefoot" was! I started full-on naked & full-on bottomless as well as interracial-symmetry because I didn't presume my self to be special and took it that others would get a kick out of having easier access to such a thing without needing to type in 3 or 4 things to search for!
HOWEVER
I will stop it if it is in the best interest of tha site's well-being & full-on functionality; just know that I didn't take to this lightly and wasn't in it entirely for selfish reasons!

Keir_Tanaka said:
...you forgot to add "to me" there at the end

No. The tags are pointless, and untagging posts to put your own made up tags is unacceptable.

I'm not trying to be a dick, so you don't need to be so defensive. Please refrain from using any tags you make up from now on.

Tallcat said:
No. The tags are pointless, and untagging posts to put your own made up tags is unacceptable.

I'm not trying to be a dick, so you don't need to be so defensive. Please refrain from using any tags you make up from now on.

If you're "not trying to be a dick" then I'm...kinda curious what it's like to be around when you're on your period, lol!

I already told you what purpose they serve so you're just "blowing smoke" saying they are pointless PERIOD end of discussion which is a dick move when done while giving 0 explanation beyond even saying "I don't see tha point" yourself! I've also NEVER untagged anything to enact my own tag(s)...save 4 tha following: bottomless - interracial - barefoot; I only did those because they are still reachable even with my modifying the existing tag to stand out as being indicative of my tag on top of tha former!

You wanna talk about a useless/pointless tag then barefoot - feet - no shoes seem like viable candidates...until you realize that feet does not indicate barefoot and no shoes doesn't mean no sandals or other open shoes type thereof either so they become necessary to they looking for those specific things!

I'LL TELL YA WHAT: Since you said "Please" just then+I am new here, Master Janitor, I will stop enacting my new tags at this point and when you get a load of either reasons why my new tags are ruining these operations OR a load of users that hate my new tags(for whatever reason)then I WILL delete my "whole new tags" at tha source personally!

You have a good one...what "one" you have is entirely up to you!

These tags are pointless because they make no sense, especially their wiki entries. Not that it's bad having specific tags for specific stuff, but these tags are so specific they're unusable. Especially "interracial symmetry", what does that even mean?

And please, fix your language. EdBum14 is easier to understand than you.

Could there be something implemented that would indicate in the thumbnail that the image was a gif or HTML5 video?

just_juan said:
Especially "interracial symmetry", what does that even mean?

And please, fix your language. EdBum14 is easier to understand than you.

Well fortunate for you I have yet to be introduced to this EdBum14 at this point...but I'll bet I'll wanna give you AN EPIC PINCH when I do, lol!
ANYWAY
They make no sense because the description(s) isn't/aren't appealing to you and I personally would rather not putting in 3 to 6 descriptions to find these things but it wasn't just for me and I have talked to others at various other sites that like these themes I've invented here so I thought you nice people would appreciate it as well! On top of everything else I know for a fact that my tags are at least not preventing anyone else from finding what they want so they're not ruining anything by existing as well and I have filled in descriptions that existed before me!

I especially don't understand what's difficult about understanding my tags definitions if you even bothered looking em up prior as well but I'll tell yas right here:

Interracial-Symmetry
It's Simple, you have 2 characters that are 2 opposing colors or a big enough varying brightness of the same color each and if the character with the brightest color has brighter hair and/or the other has darker hair OR the other way around then there ya go!
visual aid(s): https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/1102267 / https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/3966359

NOT Interracial-Symmetry; visual aid: https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/1597818

ALSO

full-on naked eliminates tha need for barefoot/feet - bare legs - nude - full body...maybe not full body I guess!

Keir_Tanaka said:
full-on naked eliminates tha need for barefoot/feet - bare legs - nude - full body...maybe not full body I guess!

That's exactly the issue. Nothing was wrong with those tags, and when you remove them in place of your own made up tag it makes things harder to find.

Also I'm 99% sure this IS Edbum.

Tallcat said:
That's exactly the issue. Nothing was wrong with those tags, and when you remove them in place of your own made up tag it makes things harder to find.

Also I'm 99% sure this IS Edbum.

Well you're wrong...about me being Edbum and you can't prove it so there, nah-nah; jk, lol...I'm really not though!
ALSO
How many times do I have to tell you I never bleeding removed any tags except the 3 I told you earlier? I didn't realize I had to "spoon-feed" this point to you as what I meant is that if I/anyone want(s) "full-on naked" it "eliminates the need for" me/anyone to input "barefoot/feet - bare legs - nude - full body" into the search field when we really want that 1 thing!

I'm sure there's a way we can come to some sort of agreement and I'll rectify the recreation of the bottomless tag(s) I actually have redone, nest-pas!

Keir_Tanaka said:
I'm sure there's a way we can come to some sort of agreement

Stop untagging properly tagged images and making up your own tags.

Looking at your tag history will clearly show you essentially vandalizing posts, and you aren't helping a single person.

I agree with you stopping editing tags entirely.

Tallcat said:
Also I'm 99% sure this IS Edbum.

Nah. Again, EdBum is much easier to understand.

Keir_Tanaka said:
Well you're wrong...about me being Edbum and you can't prove it so there, nah-nah; jk, lol...I'm really not though!

Gee~ you sure did convince us...

full-on_naked is pointless imho. If you're really searching for a post with the qualifications mentioned in the full-on_naked wiki, then you're just being way too picky. I'm not going to waste time and scan an image for all those details just to be able to tag it full-on_naked.

just_juan said:
Nah. Again, EdBum is much easier to understand.

You're right. Edbum was WAY better than this guy.

just_juan said:
Nah. Again, EdBum is much easier to understand.

Tallcat said:
You're right. Edbum was WAY better than this guy.

Don't bully

Galinoa said:
Don't bully

I wasn't trying to put down Edbum's alt account. Just saying how great the original was.

just_juan said:
Nah. Again, EdBum is much easier to understand.

Yo MaMa; jk, lol! Well pardon me for speaking bloody english!

Tallcat said:
Stop untagging properly tagged images and making up your own tags.

Looking at your tag history will clearly show you essentially vandalizing posts, and you aren't helping a single person.

I'm putting em back, stop hating/being unreasonable! You're also wrong again, I am at least helping myself! Not so much seeing as how I'm now disbanding my operation or at least minimizing it!

This is about as much a hindrance to everyone else(now that I'm putting those 3 back)as that - that rule I read on the comment thing that prohibits commenting things the characters in the image might be saying which is 1 of my favorite things to do on other sites! They have nothing against it but here yall hate it so I don't do it out of common courtesy even though there's no good reason not to!

What you're proposing is I should have nothing even though this doesn't hinder anyone else since I'm putting em back!

Galinoa said:
full-on_naked is pointless imho. If you're really searching for a post with the qualifications mentioned in the full-on_naked wiki, then you're just being way too picky. I'm not going to waste time and scan an image for all those details just to be able to tag it full-on_naked.

Oh because you're lazy & selfish...then again no one's asking you to I'm endeavoring to do it myself!

Keir_Tanaka said:
Oh because you're lazy & selfish...then again no one's asking you to I'm endeavoring to do it myself!

Thank you. Have fun doing so~

You know what I'm going to start over/from the top/full-on do-over and you all that I'm currently arguing with here may have already responded to my recent posts before I post this but I won't respond to those and ask that you judge me from the moment this is posted forward as I will all of you!
ALSO
I would like to apologize for anything I may have said/done here that actually was(for lack of a better word)mean-spirited but some of it was meant in jest & comedy or may have come oof as an attempt to force my kill on this site!

WHOLE NEW SLATE

OK well 1st off I invented a few new tags including but not limited to full-on naked - full-on bottomless - interracial-symmetry to make a better distinction between rather generic entries and the entries that align with my exacting standards which are specific but I didn't/don't feel are as specific or complex as others here have said prior; admittedly they are MY standards & interests so of course I feel they're rather simplistic!

Now 2nd off while enacting these tags I admittedly lazily & somewhat selfishly eliminated certain other tags(yes vandalizing really)in my wake BUT I am in the process of rectifying my shortsightedness!

That is all for now!

1 MORE THING

Seriously is "EdBum14" a real user here or did you all just make em up?